Expandi vs Waalaxy in 2026, pricing, features and who each is for
NudgeLink team · Published · Last updated · 3 min read
Short answer: Waalaxy is far cheaper, from €19 per user a month on Pro against Expandi's $99 per seat, but Pro caps you at 300 invites a month and is template-first. Expandi costs more and gives you deeper sequence logic, a dedicated country-based IP per account and white-label for agencies. In short, pick Waalaxy to start cheaply with templates, and Expandi when you run outreach for clients or need complex sequences.
Everything about Expandi and Waalaxy below comes from each vendor's own website, checked on 2026-09-29. Waalaxy bills in euros and Expandi in dollars, and we haven't converted anything, so compare the numbers at today's exchange rate. Annual billing is cheaper on most tools, and prices change, so check before you buy. Full disclosure: we make NudgeLink, a third option, and we say where it fits at the end.
Pricing: Expandi vs Waalaxy
| Expandi | Waalaxy | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat; the agency plan (10+ seats) is custom-priced | Per user, with a monthly invite cap per plan |
| Plans | Business: $99/month ($79 on annual billing) | Pro €19 (300 invites/month), Advanced €49 (800 invites/month), Business €69 (800 invites/month, adds cold email) |
| 1 LinkedIn account | $99/month ($79 on annual billing) | €19/month (Pro) to €69/month (Business) |
| 6 LinkedIn accounts | $594/month on monthly billing (6 × $99) | €114/month on Pro, €414/month on Business (6 × €19 and 6 × €69) |
Our own arithmetic for the middle plan: six Waalaxy Advanced users would be 6 × €49 = €294 a month.
Features side by side
| Expandi | Waalaxy | |
|---|---|---|
| Finding and sequencing | 11 campaign types; sequences with 10 actions and 10 conditions based on prospect behaviour | Prospect lists built from LinkedIn profiles through a Chrome extension; AI assistant for finding prospects |
| Message writing | Personalized videos, images and GIFs via Sendspark and Hyperize; AI assistant (MCP) in private beta | 99+ sequence templates; AI assistant for messaging |
| Connect any email provider for follow-ups, with email performance tracking | Cold email with follow-ups (Business plan); email finder | |
| Replies | Smart inbox with labels and tags; campaign analytics | Smart LinkedIn inbox with scheduling |
| Account safety | Dedicated country-based IP per account, automatic warm-up, fine-tuned daily limit ranges | Monthly invite caps per plan (300 on Pro, 800 on Advanced and Business) |
| CRM and integrations | Native CRM integrations and webhooks | HubSpot, Pipedrive, plus Make and Zapier |
| Agency features | Multi-account workspaces, roles and permissions, client dashboards, white-label | Team use, with per-user pricing |
When Expandi is the better pick
- You need white-label to resell outreach under your own brand.
- You want complex branching sequences, or image and GIF personalization.
- You want a dedicated country-based IP for each account, plus managed warm-up.
When Waalaxy is the better pick
- You want the cheapest way to automate connection requests, and templates are fine.
- You have never done LinkedIn outreach and want a guided, template-first tool.
- You need HubSpot or Pipedrive today, or you prefer to connect through Make or Zapier.
Where NudgeLink fits
If neither fits, NudgeLink prices differently: a flat $119/month (Scale) for any number of LinkedIn accounts, based on credits rather than seats. It focuses on scoring every lead from 0 to 100 against your ideal customer before anyone is contacted, and on writing each message for one person, with your approval first. It costs more than Waalaxy Pro at small scale, has no white-label and no public API, and HubSpot sync is still in development.
See the NudgeLink vs Waalaxy and NudgeLink vs Expandi pages, or why per-seat pricing punishes agencies for the six-account maths across the main tools.
Before you buy
Prices were checked on 2026-09-29. Check each pricing page, look at annual billing, and test any tool on one account first. A cap of 300 or 800 invites a month is not a target to hit: the safe number of connection requests per day is usually lower than a plan allows.